Through classroom teaching, curriculum development and departmental leadership, I have become increasingly interested in what happens between agreed plans and everyday practice.
My MSc in Leadership in Professional Contexts is helping me examine these experiences more critically. Ideas about curriculum enactment, professional agency, distributed leadership and ethics sometimes help explain what I have observed. At other times, they challenge assumptions I had previously taken for granted.
Leadership involves paying attention not only to the decisions that are made, but to how people understand and act upon them.
Developing and reviewing curricula has made me more aware that common standards and shared documents do not necessarily guarantee a common experience for students.
Teachers make professional judgements about pacing, emphasis and how best to respond to the students in front of them. Those decisions are an essential part of teaching, but they also influence how learning develops across classrooms and year groups.
Thinking about curriculum as something enacted, rather than simply delivered, has shifted my attention towards the importance of professional dialogue. Alignment matters, but so does developing a clearer understanding of what progression and quality look like in practice.
Working within grade-level and departmental teams has led me to question what we actually mean by collaboration.
Sharing resources, distributing tasks and meeting regularly can all be useful. However, they do not necessarily mean that a team has developed a shared understanding of its work. Equally, working collaboratively should not require everyone to teach in exactly the same way.
My study of professional agency has also encouraged me to consider how teachers' decisions are influenced by experience, relationships, expectations and organisational circumstances.
I am particularly interested in where teams need collective agreement, where individual judgement remains essential, and how schools can establish meaningful shared responsibility without making professional autonomy simply another form of compliance.
Some of my most positive experiences of leadership have involved relatively small actions: thoughtful feedback, encouragement, follow-up and genuine recognition of professional effort. They have influenced how I try to support colleagues myself.
However, studying distributed and ethical leadership has made me more conscious of the responsibilities that cannot always be addressed through support and encouragement alone.
Not everyone necessarily wants additional leadership responsibility, even when opportunities are available. Collective participation can strengthen decision-making, but it can also create tensions when perspectives differ or decisions need to be made.
I am increasingly interested in leadership as both a relational practice and a responsibility to exercise judgement, establish expectations and consider the consequences of decisions.
Experiencing different approaches to teacher evaluation has made me more aware of the difference between a process being thorough and genuinely supporting professional development.
Trust can make feedback easier to receive, but it does not remove the need for clarity and guidance. Equally, monitoring performance does not automatically lead to professional learning.
I am interested in what happens between formal professional development opportunities: teachers discussing student learning, questioning their approaches, sharing expertise and following up on what they have tried.
This has encouraged me to think more carefully about how leadership can help make professional learning a meaningful part of everyday practice rather than something that happens mainly through scheduled events.
My current thinking is shaped by several questions that continue to develop through experience, study and reflection:
What should teachers and teams agree collectively, and what should remain a matter of individual professional judgement?
When does collaboration lead to meaningful changes in practice rather than simply helping to coordinate work?
How can leaders maintain professional trust while making expectations and accountability clearer?
What does shared leadership look like when some colleagues do not want additional leadership responsibilities?
How can schools establish whether professional learning is making a difference to teaching and students' experiences?
These questions do not represent a settled philosophy or a proposed model of leadership. They reflect where my practical experiences and academic study are currently meeting, and they continue to shape how I approach my work.